Publicado: Mar Ene 30, 2007 11:17 am
Buenas.
Pues obviamente la fuente de mis citas debe estar equivocada, aunque también se refiere a El Otro Lado de la Colina como origen de las mismas.
El Enlace es:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERmanteuffel.htm
Y el texto integro de donde saqué la cita(en pikinglis)...
Fire-power, armour protection, speed and cross-country performance are the essentials, and the best type of tank is that which combines these conflicting requirements with most success. In my opinion the German Panzer V, the 'Panther', was the most satisfactory of all, and would have been dose to the ideal had it been possible to design with a lower silhouette. A main lesson I learned from all my experience was that much more importance should be placed on the speed of the tank on the battlefield than was generally believed before the war, and even during, the war. It is a matter of life or death for the tank to avoid the deadly effect of enemy fire by being able to move quickly from one fire-position to another. Manoeuvrability develops into a 'weapon' and often ranks equal to firepower and armour- protection.
También hay dos referencias al Stalin...
The Stalin tank is the heaviest in the world; it has robust tracks and good armour. A further advantage is its low build - it is 51 cm lower than our Panzer V, the Panther. As a 'breakthrough' tank it is undoubtedly good, but too slow.
It was at Targul Frumos that I first met the Stalin tanks. It was a shock to find that, although my Tigers began to hit them at a range of 3,000 metres, our shells bounced off, and did not penetrate them until we had closed to half that distance. But I was able to counter the Russians' superiority by manoeuvre and mobility, in making the best use of ground cover.
Que más o menos viene a decir que el Stalin era un buen tanque desde el punto de vista de blindaje, robustez mecánica y bajo perfil, pero demasiado lento. También comenta que el primer encuentro con los Stalin fue complicadito, los Tigre empezaron a sacudirles a 3.000 metros pero los proyectiles rebotaban y tuvieron que acercarse a la mitad de la distancia para tener éxito. Sin embargo consiguió contrarrestar la superioridad rusa a base de maniobra, movilidad y terreno.
Cosas de internet.
Saludos.
Pues obviamente la fuente de mis citas debe estar equivocada, aunque también se refiere a El Otro Lado de la Colina como origen de las mismas.
El Enlace es:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERmanteuffel.htm
Y el texto integro de donde saqué la cita(en pikinglis)...
Fire-power, armour protection, speed and cross-country performance are the essentials, and the best type of tank is that which combines these conflicting requirements with most success. In my opinion the German Panzer V, the 'Panther', was the most satisfactory of all, and would have been dose to the ideal had it been possible to design with a lower silhouette. A main lesson I learned from all my experience was that much more importance should be placed on the speed of the tank on the battlefield than was generally believed before the war, and even during, the war. It is a matter of life or death for the tank to avoid the deadly effect of enemy fire by being able to move quickly from one fire-position to another. Manoeuvrability develops into a 'weapon' and often ranks equal to firepower and armour- protection.
También hay dos referencias al Stalin...
The Stalin tank is the heaviest in the world; it has robust tracks and good armour. A further advantage is its low build - it is 51 cm lower than our Panzer V, the Panther. As a 'breakthrough' tank it is undoubtedly good, but too slow.
It was at Targul Frumos that I first met the Stalin tanks. It was a shock to find that, although my Tigers began to hit them at a range of 3,000 metres, our shells bounced off, and did not penetrate them until we had closed to half that distance. But I was able to counter the Russians' superiority by manoeuvre and mobility, in making the best use of ground cover.
Que más o menos viene a decir que el Stalin era un buen tanque desde el punto de vista de blindaje, robustez mecánica y bajo perfil, pero demasiado lento. También comenta que el primer encuentro con los Stalin fue complicadito, los Tigre empezaron a sacudirles a 3.000 metros pero los proyectiles rebotaban y tuvieron que acercarse a la mitad de la distancia para tener éxito. Sin embargo consiguió contrarrestar la superioridad rusa a base de maniobra, movilidad y terreno.
Cosas de internet.
Saludos.